Carapinha, J. (2000) Continuing Professional Development in Human Resource Management. Journal of Modern Pharmacy, 7 (10), 1-6. Carapinha, J. (2003) Rational Self-Medication within a South African Context. The Journal of Modern Pharmacy, February 2003. Carapinha, J. (2005) Ethical Decision Making in Managed Health Care. South African Pharmaceutical Journal, 72 (2). Carapinha, J. (2005) Evidence-Based Pharmacy Practice. [...]
- Carapinha, J. (2000) Continuing Professional Development in Human Resource Management. Journal of Modern Pharmacy, 7 (10), 1-6.
- Carapinha, J. (2003) Rational Self-Medication within a South African Context. The Journal of Modern Pharmacy, February 2003.
- Carapinha, J. (2005) Ethical Decision Making in Managed Health Care. South African Pharmaceutical Journal, 72 (2).
- Carapinha, J. (2005) Evidence-Based Pharmacy Practice. South African Pharmaceutical Journal, 72 (4).
- Carapinha, J. (2006) The Value of Medicine in Improving the Quality of Care. Journal of South African Family Practice, 2006;48(10):6-10.
- Carapinha J. Producing Affordable Medicines in South Africa. In: Cohen JC, Illingworth P, Schuklenk U, editors. The Power of Pills. Maryland: Pluto Books; 2006. 251-259.
- Carapinha, J. (2008) Setting the Stage for Risk-Sharing Agreements: International Experiences and Outcomes-based Reimbursement. Journal of South African Family Practice, 2008;50(4):62-65.
- Carapinha, J. (2008) Policy Guidelines for Risk-sharing agreements in South Africa. Journal of South African Family Practice, 2008;50(5):43-46.
- Carapinha, J. (2008) Private pharmacies in an integrated approach to HIV/AIDS services. Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS, 2008 December; 5(4): 206-209.
- Carapinha, J. (2008) An Integrated Approach to HIV/AIDS Services in South Africa: Private Pharmacies and Policy Recommendations. Africa Policy Journal, Spring/Summer 2008 Edition. Volume 4. Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
- Carapinha, J. Ross-Degnan, D. Desta, AT. Wagner, A. (2011) Health insurance systems in five Sub-Saharan African countries: medicine benefits and data for decision making. Health Policy, 2011; 99(3): 193-202.
- Carapinha, J. Ross-Degnan, D. Vialle-Valentin, C. Wagner, A. (2012) Gender and treatment for HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria in LMIC: A systematic review. (In Press)
A new report from the Science and Technology Innovation Program at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars defines the criteria for a new technology assessment function in the United States. The report, Reinventing Technology Assessment: A 21st Century Model, emphasizes the need to incorporate citizen-participation methods to complement expert analysis. Government policymakers, businesses, non-governmental [...]
A new report from the Science and Technology Innovation Program at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars defines the criteria for a new technology assessment function in the United States. The report, Reinventing Technology Assessment: A 21st Century Model, emphasizes the need to incorporate citizen-participation methods to complement expert analysis. Government policymakers, businesses, non-governmental organizations, and citizens need such analysis to capably navigate the technology-intensive world in which we now live.
This article by Huw Tippett reminds me so much of discussions during the 90′s when pharmaceutical companies were under considerable pressure from governments to lower prices. Much of this gave rise to alternative business models and this is partly the reason for the risk-sharing models /pay for performance discuss today. Tippett’s article discusses an inflection [...]
This article by Huw Tippett reminds me so much of discussions during the 90′s when pharmaceutical companies were under considerable pressure from governments to lower prices. Much of this gave rise to alternative business models and this is partly the reason for the risk-sharing models /pay for performance discuss today. Tippett’s article discusses an inflection point as though it were an event. The inflection point he refers to is a transformative process and is less about a single point but rather a series of incremental changes over time. One of those changes is the need to move away from out-dated business models that rely heavily on marketing and selling to one that focuses on extracting the economic value of innovation and aligning these to societal demands.
Joao
**********
Huw Tippett, head of global sales for Novartis, explains his firm’s new focus on creating customer value and unlocking value from key accounts. Not long ago, the pharmaceutical industry was cruising through wildly profitable times. Sales forces were growing, market access was easy, and loss of exclusivity was an afterthought. How things have changed. Today, sales forces seem bloated, rep productivity is falling, market access is more difficult, cost containment pressures are greater, shifts in stakeholder power are substantial, and competition from generics is formidable. Taken together, these changes constitute an inflection point for the industry, says Huw Tippett, head of global sales for Novartis.
Asia has experienced rapid growth in the biomedical sciences and pharmaceutical fields. Within the last decade, Singapore has established itself as a global scientific powerhouse, attracting leading companies. The city-state has built up a reputation for biomedical sciences innovation in addition to being a global financial and business hub.
Singapore’s biomedical sciences industry contributes 4.1% [...]
Asia has experienced rapid growth in the biomedical sciences and pharmaceutical fields. Within the last decade, Singapore has established itself as a global scientific powerhouse, attracting leading companies. The city-state has built up a reputation for biomedical sciences innovation in addition to being a global financial and business hub.
Singapore’s biomedical sciences industry contributes 4.1% to the country’s gross domestic product (GDP), manufactures about US$14 billion worth of patented pharmaceutical products and medical devices for global markets, and employs more than 16,000 people. More than 50 companies conduct R&D in Singapore, including drug discovery and development, translational and clinical research, and medical technology innovation. In 2008 alone, R&D expenditure in biomedical sciences exceeded US$715 million.
Read more, source: Drug Discovery and Development
SINGAPORE’S biomedical manufacturing output grew at a robust pace last year to reach $21 billion and employed 13,000 people, the Economic Development Board (EDB) said yesterday.
According to Spring Singapore, last year’s production outpaced the previous year’s $19 billion and a value-add of $10.6 billion.
Last year, the sector attracted cumulative capital of $1.2 billion [...]
SINGAPORE’S biomedical manufacturing output grew at a robust pace last year to reach $21 billion and employed 13,000 people, the Economic Development Board (EDB) said yesterday.
According to Spring Singapore, last year’s production outpaced the previous year’s $19 billion and a value-add of $10.6 billion.
Last year, the sector attracted cumulative capital of $1.2 billion – the funds that firms invest over the entire period of their project – putting Singapore on track to become Asia’s biomedical centre, the EDB said. Once completed, these projects will create more than 1,600 jobs.
Singapore’s strategic location makes it a prime spot for companies seeking to tap into the region’s fast-growing healthcare markets.
“As Asia’s leading bio-cluster, Singapore is well-positioned to help biomedical- sciences companies accelerate their innovation and capitalise on Asia’s growth story,” said Mr Julian Ho, EDB’s assistant managing director.
The biomedical manufacturing cluster, which includes pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and medical-technology products, has been hailed as manufacturing’s saviour in previous quarters.
Manufacturing’s 39.4 per cent rebound in January over the same period last year – its biggest climb in 26 years – was spurred by an almost 50 per cent surge in biomedical output, particularly of pharmaceutical ingredients.
Pharma also came to the rescue last year, when manufacturing numbers bounced back in the second and third quarters largely due to Influenza A (H1N1), said DBS economist Irvine Seah in an earlier interview with my paper.
The medical-technology sector has also done its part in pulling up productivity, said Mr Lee Hock Wee, senior manager for industry analysis unit at the Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology.
Its 1.8 per cent projected rise during last year’s downturn comes on the back of healthy growth over the last nine years.
Government efforts to attract multinational corporations to set up operations here have contributed to med-tech’s resilience, Mr Lee added. “Strong overseas demand for therapeutic respiration apparatus, surgical instruments and cosmetic dental fittings is likely to continue driving output here too,” he said.
The robust growth prospects have seen increased hiring across the biomedical manufacturing sector. Last year, about 900 jobs were added, bringing total headcount to over 13,000. Meanwhile, companies like 3M and Welch Allyn are tapping into Singapore’s scientific and engineering know-how to develop cost-effective products.
According to the EDB, more than 4,300 researchers are carrying out biomedical- science R&D in 50 companies and 30 public-sector institutes, expending more than $1 billion annually.
In the same period, leading Japanese pharmaceutical firm Takeda opened its new regional headquarters to work with its regional clinical-trial coordination centre and R&D centre in Singapore. Drug giant GlaxoSmithKline, which recently opened its first vaccine plant in Asia here, is training the local manpower required to run its facilities.
Medical-technology firm Medtronic also announced it will build its first-in-Asia cardiac-device global manufacturing facility in Singapore.
Globally, the industry faces several challenges, including the need to improve research-and-development productivity.
It must also navigate diverse cultures when doing business in this part of the world.
Source: AsiaOne News
In Australia, sales of the leading 20 cancer drugs grew 30% a year on average during 2003-8, reaching US$545 million in the latter year and, despite slower growth over the following 10 years, will reach US$1 billion by 2018, say new forecasts.
Molecular targeted therapies are the leading class of cancer treatments in Australia, with [...]
In Australia, sales of the leading 20 cancer drugs grew 30% a year on average during 2003-8, reaching US$545 million in the latter year and, despite slower growth over the following 10 years, will reach US$1 billion by 2018, say new forecasts.
Molecular targeted therapies are the leading class of cancer treatments in Australia, with sales of such products in the top 20 totalling $320 million. They have accounted for most of the overall growth in the market during 2005-8, driven by the uptake of high-priced products and a lack of generic competition, according to the new study, from Datamonitor. The report expects these products to continue driving market growth in Australia over the next 10 years, with sales set to reach $750 million in 2018, reflecting the market’s potential for increased uptake in existing indications and further expansion of indications.
The other two cancer product classes – therapies and antihormonal treatments – predate the molecular targeted therapies. They are associated with varying levels of toxicity and Datamonitor believes that, combined, their sales will reach just $200 million in 2018. It is increasingly widely thought that tumour-targeted agents “could become some of the most powerful tools in the fight against cancer, due to their ability to discriminate between cancerous cells and other healthy cell types,” says Lisette Oversteegen, senior healthcare analyst at Datamonitor.
The top-selling cancer drug in Australia in 2008 was Herceptin (trastuzumab), Roche’s molecular targeted therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-positive breast cancer. The product’s sales reached $120 million in the year, having grown by an annual average of 61% since 2005, and it has exceptional reimbursement status both within and outside Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).
Herceptin’s sales will continue growing in the near future, due to its widespread use among breast cancer patients and an approval in HER-2 gastric cancer, but its revenues will be “somewhat dampened” by uptake of GlaxoSmithKline’s Tykerb/Tyverb (lapatinib), which is also a molecular targeted treatment but has the advantage of oral administration, while Herceptin is available as an intravenous drug only, comments Ms Oversteegen. Furthermore, continued development of Tykerb/Tyverb “is expected to result in an approval and PBS listing for first-line and adjuvant treatment, placing it in direct competition with Herceptin,” she notes.
Another targeted cancer therapy from Roche is Avastin (bevacizumab), but while this product’s 2008 sales reached $2.5 billion in the USA alone, its uptake in Australia has so far been slow, due to a lack of reimbursement for three of its four indications, resulting in sales of just under $8 million. Avastin’s only PBS listing so far came in mid-2009, for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, with an earlier submission having been rejected over concerns that the drug would be used off-label and would therefore have an unacceptably high cost-effectiveness ratio.
However, Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has also approved Avastin for the treatment of breast cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma, and the drug’s sales in the country will reach $190 million by 2018, due to fast indication expansion, forecasts Datamonitor. Assuming that the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) does not create too many hurdles on its path to reimbursement for these additional indications, Avastin should become Australia’s second-highest-selling cancer drug by 2018, behind Roche’s Rituxan/MabThera (rituximab), whose revenues should reach $225 million by that date, according to Ms Oversteegen.
Sign up for our mailing list:
Thanks for visiting!
- Access Asia Pacific Biotech Brazil China Counterfeit developing countries Drug Prices Emerging Markets Ethics Generics Health Insurance HIV/AIDS India Industrial Policy Innovation Intellectual Property Managed health care medicines Nanotechnology News pharmaceutical pharmaceutical policy Pharmacists Pharmacoeconomics Philippines Poverty public policy Quality R&D Regulatory Affairs Reimbursement Risk sharing Russia Singapore South Africa Supply Chain Taiwan Trade Vaccines
Archives
- October 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- September 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- October 2008
- July 2008
- October 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- November 2005

