João L. Carapinha, Brook K. Baker
The spice trade of antiquity and contemporary medicine trade appear to share much in common.
For centuries, Greeks and Romans traded spice with Asia using trade routes over land and sea to India and China. They were the Indian-Roman routes and Incense routes with paths crossing the [...]
João L. Carapinha, Brook K. Baker
The spice trade of antiquity and contemporary medicine trade appear to share much in common.
For centuries, Greeks and Romans traded spice with Asia using trade routes over land and sea to India and China. They were the Indian-Roman routes and Incense routes with paths crossing the Red Sea and Asia Minor – the same routes that Marco Polo used and later detailed in his book The Travels of Marco Polo. When the Ottomans defeated the Byzantine Empire in 1453, all spice trade between Asia and Europe ceased because Europeans refused to pay exorbitant taxes on goods traveling west through the Ottoman Empire. Europeans were left with no option but to explore alternative trade routes to the east. In 1497, Vasco da Gama, the great Portuguese explorer and navigator, pioneered a Portuguese trade route that connected Lisbon to India around the tip of South Africa, and thus started the Age of Discovery. Much of his work was built on the efforts of Bartholomeu Dias, another Portuguese navigator, who nine years prior rounded the Cape of Good Hope, currently Cape Town.
In 2008 and 2009, customs officials in the Netherlands, Germany, and France seized nearly 20 shipments of unpatented generic medicines lawfully produced in India that were being transshipped through Europe on their way to Africa, Latin America, and other destinations where they could be lawfully imported and consumed without violating any domestic patent rights. What was the problem according to complaining Big Pharma companies and border officials – transshipment violated fictional patent rules that provided that the medicines should be treated as if they had been manufactured in Europe. In one instance there was confusion about an alleged trademark infringement for a medicine that merely was labeled with the international non-proprietary name. Indian, Brazil and access-to-medicines activists complained bitterly and Brazil and India brought separate complaints at the World Trade Organization challenging the seizures and the law (EU Border Measures Regulation 1383/2003) upon which they were based. The European Court of Justice has since clarified that goods shouldn’t be seized unless they are intended for the European market and the EU is discussing a proposed amendment to its border regulations to the same effect. However, the current debate overlooks a much bigger question that history can help answer. India, why do you continue to rely on European trade routes for medicine exportation to low- and middle-income (LMI) countries?
It seems odd from a geographical perspective that medicines bound for Sub-Saharan Africa, for example, should transit through Europe. If alternative, efficient trade routes were established and expanded, will it negate the need for much of the debate on EU odious border regulation? Alleged patent and trademark infringements may become superfluous when medicines are not routed through Europe. Like Europe after 1453 that refused to pay high taxes on goods resulting in Portuguese-led alternative trade routes, perhaps India should do the same. Follow the preliminary lead of some India producers who have already changed their routes, cut all medicine trade through Europe and look to new trade routes that connect generic medicine producers in India directly to the poor in Sub-Saharan Africa. There are many risks and the costs of doing so are probably high, but so was the Age of Discovery – a treacherous and time-consuming path to India around Africa compared to those through the Ottoman Empire. It brought Europe out of the Middle Ages and it may open a new age for India’s development and South-South trade more broadly. Medicine prices may increase in the short-term but it is a price worth paying to secure favorable trade routes in the long-term. Better direct trade-route partnerships between India and LMI countries are needed. Infrastructure improvement at ports (air and sea), tax exemption on all medicine trade between partner countries, and an independent agency to certify medicine authenticity and to expedite product registration may be among the tools used to optimize direct and improved trade in medicines.
Ancient spice trade and current medicine trade share much in common. History has taught us that if trade routes become unfavorable because of geopolitical changes, then it may be time to look to alternatives. It has also taught us that the risks are high but the benefits overshadow these when assessed retrospectively. India, why do you continue to rely on European trade routes for medicine exportation to low and middle-income (LMI) countries? Do what the Europeans did after 1453; you will not regret it in the long-term.
Thieves that divert medicines from government stores prevent many thousands of patients from receiving care. The article below suggests that thieves are also calculating in that they only steal medicines nearing their expiration date. Such thoughtful thefts are great stock controllers but why would they loot government stores [...]
Thieves that divert medicines from government stores prevent many thousands of patients from receiving care. The article below suggests that thieves are also calculating in that they only steal medicines nearing their expiration date. Such thoughtful thefts are great stock controllers but why would they loot government stores of near-expired medicines? If the purpose of the act is to resell medicines then “fresh” medicines would fetch a better price than those nearing expiration? It just does not make sense, does it? The article also suggests that stolen medicines are transported by ship from East African ports to West Africa. From Dar Es Salaam to Lagos is 5035 nautical miles around the tip of southern Africa and a vessel travelling at 14 knots would take 15 days. That’s a 15 day reduction in the life of the medicine and many medicines are sure to be expired by the time they reach Lagos. If expired medicines are landing on the shores of Nigeria why are officials not blocking their entry? The answer is multifaceted and it suggests that the networks coordinating such activities are trans-African and that they are protected and facilitated by strategically positioned and influential individuals. The answer is also linked to the lack of donor organization oversight of medicines purchased for patients in developing countries which is partly a function of what is being measured. That which is measured is known and that which is known is monitored. We’re always happy to know that an additional million dollars of life-saving medicines was purchased and supplied to a certain country. We measure the success based on the “additional million dollars” spent, issue press releases, and stop. Seldom do we hear something like this, an additional million dollars of medicines was bought AND consumed by the targeted patients. This second portion is far more difficult and is a significant gap in what we measure and how we monitor donor organization activities in developing countries. Plug this gap with systems to improve accountability and ensure target groups are reached and we’ll be well on our way to reducing the effectiveness of medicine thefts and their strategically positioned and influential facilitators.
Interpol has carried out a series of raids worldwide which has resulted in a series of arrests and “the seizure of thousands of potentially harmful medical products”.
Operation Pangea II, a week-long initiative involving 24 countries, was coordinated by Interpol and the World Health Organisation’s International Medical Products Anti-Counterfeiting Taskforce. Regulators, police and customs officials [...]
Interpol has carried out a series of raids worldwide which has resulted in a series of arrests and “the seizure of thousands of potentially harmful medical products”.
Operation Pangea II, a week-long initiative involving 24 countries, was coordinated by Interpol and the World Health Organisation’s International Medical Products Anti-Counterfeiting Taskforce. Regulators, police and customs officials worked closely together during the crackdown from November 16-20 and focused on “the three principal components used by illegal websites to conduct trade” – the internet service provider, payment systems and the delivery services.
During the operation, internet monitoring revealed 751 websites engaged in illegal activity, including offering controlled or prescription-only drugs, 72 of which have now been taken down. More than 16,000 packages were inspected by regulators and customs, 995 of which were seized and nearly 167,000 illicit and counterfeit pills, including antibiotics, steroids and slimming pills, were confiscated.
Read more here
Sign up for our mailing list:
Thanks for visiting!
- Access Asia Pacific Biotech Brazil China Counterfeit developing countries Drug Prices Emerging Markets Ethics Generics Health Insurance HIV/AIDS India Industrial Policy Innovation Intellectual Property Managed health care medicines Nanotechnology News pharmaceutical pharmaceutical policy Pharmacists Pharmacoeconomics Philippines Poverty public policy Quality R&D Regulatory Affairs Reimbursement Risk sharing Russia Singapore South Africa Supply Chain Taiwan Trade Vaccines
Archives
- October 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- September 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- October 2008
- July 2008
- October 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- November 2005

