Currently viewing the tag: "Trade"

 

João L. Carapinha, Brook K. Baker

The spice trade of antiquity and contemporary medicine trade appear to share much in common.

For centuries, Greeks and Romans traded spice with Asia using trade routes over land and sea to India and China. They were the Indian-Roman routes and Incense routes with paths crossing the Red Sea and Asia Minor – the same routes that Marco Polo used and later detailed in his book The Travels of Marco Polo. When the Ottomans defeated the Byzantine Empire in 1453, all spice trade between Asia and Europe ceased because Europeans refused to pay exorbitant taxes on goods traveling west through the Ottoman Empire. Europeans were left with no option but to explore alternative trade routes to the east. In 1497, Vasco da Gama, the great Portuguese explorer and navigator, pioneered a Portuguese trade route that connected Lisbon to India around the tip of South Africa, and thus started the Age of Discovery. Much of his work was built on the efforts of Bartholomeu Dias, another Portuguese navigator, who nine years prior rounded the Cape of Good Hope, currently Cape Town.

In 2008 and 2009, customs officials in the Netherlands, Germany, and France seized nearly 20 shipments of unpatented generic medicines lawfully produced in India that were being transshipped through Europe on their way to Africa, Latin America, and other destinations where they could be lawfully imported and consumed without violating any domestic patent rights.  What was the problem according to complaining Big Pharma companies and border officials – transshipment violated fictional patent rules that provided that the medicines should be treated as if they had been manufactured in Europe.  In one instance there was confusion about an alleged trademark infringement for a medicine that merely was labeled with the international non-proprietary name.  Indian, Brazil and access-to-medicines activists complained bitterly and Brazil and India brought separate complaints at the World Trade Organization challenging the seizures and the law (EU Border Measures Regulation 1383/2003) upon which they were based.  The European Court of Justice has since clarified that goods shouldn’t be seized unless they are intended for the European market and the EU is discussing a proposed amendment to its border regulations to the same effect.  However, the current debate overlooks a much bigger question that history can help answer. India, why do you continue to rely on European trade routes for medicine exportation to low- and middle-income (LMI) countries?

It seems odd from a geographical perspective that medicines bound for Sub-Saharan Africa, for example, should transit through Europe. If alternative, efficient trade routes were established and expanded, will it negate the need for much of the debate on EU odious border regulation?  Alleged patent and trademark infringements may become superfluous when medicines are not routed through Europe. Like Europe after 1453 that refused to pay high taxes on goods resulting in Portuguese-led alternative trade routes, perhaps India should do the same. Follow the preliminary lead of some India producers who have already changed their routes, cut all medicine trade through Europe and look to new trade routes that connect generic medicine producers in India directly to the poor in Sub-Saharan Africa. There are many risks and the costs of doing so are probably high, but so was the Age of Discovery – a treacherous and time-consuming path to India around Africa compared to those through the Ottoman Empire. It brought Europe out of the Middle Ages and it may open a new age for India’s development and South-South trade more broadly. Medicine prices may increase in the short-term but it is a price worth paying to secure favorable trade routes in the long-term. Better direct trade-route partnerships between India and LMI countries are needed. Infrastructure improvement at ports (air and sea), tax exemption on all medicine trade between partner countries, and an independent agency to certify medicine authenticity and to expedite product registration may be among the tools used to optimize direct and improved trade in medicines.

Ancient spice trade and current medicine trade share much in common. History has taught us that if trade routes become unfavorable because of geopolitical changes, then it may be time to look to alternatives. It has also taught us that the risks are high but the benefits overshadow these when assessed retrospectively. India, why do you continue to rely on European trade routes for medicine exportation to low and middle-income (LMI) countries? Do what the Europeans did after 1453; you will not regret it in the long-term.

Tagged with:
 

The networks are awash with news of multinational pharmaceutical and biotech companies investing significant amounts to boost their presence and commercial operations in China. Its all good news but little is said about the experience of companies currently in the market. This story covers the challenges Indian generic pharmaceutical companies face and possibly points to a generalized concern.

Joao

*****

Indian pharmaceutical companies may have spread their wings far and wide, but they have been hitting the wall in China. India’s largest pharmaceutical company Ranbaxy Laboratories was the first to set up a joint venture in China in 1993, but divested its stake in in December last year even though it spent millions of rupees and launched over 40 products. Reason: Strong barriers for market access, longer time to build commercial infrastructure and difficulty in competing with Chinese players on cost. Satish Reddy, managing director and chief operating officer (COO) of Dr Reddy’s Laboratories, India’s second largest drug maker, says “the Chinese market historically has been challenging for global generics players as well as mid-sized foreign pharma companies.” So, the Indian pharmaceutical companies, which aggressively tapped various global drug markets in the past two decades, have not been able to crack the Chinese drug market with their finished drugs so far. This is despite the fact that China’s drug market grew over three times in the last seven years and is predicted to become the world’s third largest after the US and Japan within two-three years.

Source: Business Standard

Tagged with:
 

Bangladesh can export drugs worth Tk200 billion a year if the local medicine makers upgrade their facilities to a level that’ll enable them to do contract manufacturing for foreign pharmaceuticals, experts said Sunday. Drug manufacturing is becoming costly in the highly regulated western market, prompting major pharmaceutical companies to contract out drug making to companies in low-cost countries.

“Contract manufacturing is one of the major growth areas in global drug industry. And Bangladeshi companies can be one of the major beneficiaries of the fast growing sector,” said ABM Faroque, president of Bangladesh Pharmaceuticals Society (BPS). “The country’s top 10-12 drug makers have state-of-the-art drug plants and if they upgrade their facilities further, they’ll be in a position to sign lucrative contract manufacturing deals with foreign companies,” said Faroque, also a professor of pharmaceutical technology at Dhaka University.

Read more, source: The Financial Express

Tagged with:
 

The Hindu, March 9, 2010

China welcomes Indian pharmaceutical companies to help address the growing demands of its domestic market in the wake of recent healthcare reforms, said Health Minister Chen Zhu on Monday.

“We know India’s pharmaceutical sector, including non-generic and creative medicine, is leading the developing world. China has a huge market potential for healthcare services and medicine. We more than welcome pharmaceutical companies from countries like India to China,” Mr. Chen told reporters on the sidelines of the annual session of the National People’s Congress, China’s legislature.

Releasing the government’s health report for the year, Mr. Chen said the $ 123 billion healthcare reform launched last year was creating a growing demand for drugs, particularly in rural areas.

“China has 1.3 billion people and diversified medical needs,” he said.

The pharmaceutical industry was open not only to multinational drug corporations from developed countries, but also to developing countries. “Given China’s natural conditions, most of the essential drugs are for preventive and curative purposes,” he added. “They must be safe, proven effective, of high quality and also cost effective.”

Mr. Chen said the pharmaceutical sector was “quite open” to foreign players. However, the experience Indian pharmaceutical companies have had here so far suggests otherwise. Companies say they have routinely faced market access issues, and point to what they describe as long-drawn-out procedures for getting their drugs registered as another barrier to entry.

Improving market access for Indian pharmaceutical companies was among the issues Minister of Commerce and Industry Anand Sharma raised with his Chinese counterpart Chen Deming in trade talks in January.

If those issues are addressed, Indian companies will discover a domestic market expanding rapidly in the wake of a healthcare overhaul launched last March.

Health Minister Mr. Chen, is behind a radical $ 123 billion proposal to transform China’s ailing healthcare system, which, in the three decades since market reforms were launched, has increasingly excluded large sections of the country’s rural poor. The plan envisages bringing universal healthcare to 90 per cent of the population by 2011.

Part of the plan is a drug reimbursement system which includes all “essential drugs” as eligible for compensation under basic health insurance. By the end of February, the system had been launched in

1,020 of the country’s 2,859 counties, and had led to growing domestic demand for drugs, according to the Ministry of Health’s 2009 work report.

Mr. Chen, a molecular biologist by training, became only the second person in the People’s Republic of China’s six-decade history to be appointed to a ministerial position without being a member of the ruling Communist Party. He is known for being one of the few outspoken voices among the country’s usually guarded leadership, and has led the calls for a healthcare overhaul since his appointment in 2007.

Tagged with:
 

The US biotechnology industry includes about 1,500 companies with combined annual revenue of about $70 billion. Major companies include Amgen, Biogen Idec, Genentech (owned by Switzerland-based Roche), Genzyme, Life Technologies, and Monsanto. Because many drugs are now developed using biotechnology, the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries overlap considerably.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

Demand for biotechnology research in the fields of medicine, agriculture, food, and science is driven by insurers’ willingness to pay for new medical treatments, the global need to produce more food for a rapidly expanding population, and scientists’ desire to find solutions for complex scientific and medical issues. Funding for biotech research is often provided by venture capital funds hoping to cash in on new products. The profitability of individual companies depends on the discovery and effective marketing of new products. Because the market for potential products is so large, small biotechnology companies can co-exist successfully with large ones if they have expertise in a particular line of research. The industry is capital intensive: average annual revenue per worker is more than $350,000.

Biotech firms face stiff competition from pharmaceutical and other companies seeking to be first with a new product or discovery.

Full report available here

Tagged with:
 

China has finally agreed to initiate the process of opening up the pharmaceutical market for Indian companies. It has also promised to enhance buying to correct the trade imbalance caused by low Indian exports.

Chinese leaders including premier Wen Jiabao on Tuesday indicated to visiting Indian commerce minister Anand Sharma that Beijing was prepared to revise its overall approach to trade with India. Wen went to the extent of saying that healthy trade growth was essential for developing strong strategic relationship.

Sharma told Chinese commerce minister Chen Demin that New Delhi has amended visa rules on foreign workers on the basis of requests made by Beijing. Though the rules apply to companies from all companies, it is the Chinese firms that will gain most as they are usually keen to send out more workers.

The new rules make it possible for a foreign company to dispatch 40 workers for each project in India as compared to the old limitation of 20 workers. But the number of foreign workers still cannot exceed one per cent of the total number of workers employed in a project.

Indian pharmaceutical companies have been complaining of non-tariff barriers making it difficult for them to distribute medicine products in China. Chinese leaders said on Tuesday that there would be a lot of scope for Indian companies to market products as the country’s health delivery system was being hugely expanded.

“The minister did some plain talking. The Chinese leaders saw the point and even appreciated some of it,” an official involved with the talks told TNN.

The Indian side Chinese industry enjoyed a huge amount of free access to Indian markets and have profited in terms of major contracts for machinery and project installation. It was time China reciprocated and allowed similar access to Indian goods and services, they said.

Sharma was obviously playing on the Chinese desire to expand project exports to India, which has grown significantly with huge buying by the Indian power and steel sectors in recent years. Chen asked Sharma to facilitate further growth of this trend.

The Indian minister also pushed Chinese officials to arrange buying of high technology products including those produced by power equipment makers like L&T. This is significant in view of stinging criticism by L&T chief, A.M.Naik, who has been opposing dumping by Chinese power equipment makers in the Indian market.

Chinese leaders seemed a little less enthusiastic about opening up the market for information technology services and exports of food products for Indian companies.

The Indian minister also pressed for removal of tariff and non-tariff barriers on import of Basmati Rice, fruits and vegetables by China, landing rights for Indian TV channels in China, and import of more Indian films by China. He said there are procedural bottlenecks like time consuming licensing procedures being faced by Indian drugs and pharmaceuticals.

Source

Tagged with:
 

Facebook

YouTube

LinkedId